Sign up to receive info on EWG's upcoming Meat Eater's Guide to Climate Change & Health http://t.co/JAcI67x - based on CleanMetrics food LCAs.
« Framing the Food Sustainability Challenge | Main | Is sustainability all about the supply chain? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55171f8f9883301538fd83c2d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EWG's Meat Eater's Guide to Climate Change:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Hi Kumar,
I liked your data set in the EWG meat eaters guide the commercial beef data made sense based on the data set but I am having some trouble with the lamb data. Based on your data set I do not understand why lamb ranks so high. As a grazer that currently sells locally and uses best available environmental practices I 1. do not want to produce a product flagged so high outside the mean of regular animal based production and 2. am already loosing sales based on the report. I need to respond to my customer base and based on the current available data and your data set I don't understand why it is so high. Is there a publishable deeper data set? My hunch is it relates to breed and ration and the lowest cost production model of the survey group but I do not want to jump to conclusions. I just want to make things better.
Thanks in advance
Sean
Posted by: Sean Dodson | August 02, 2011 at 09:42 PM